Recent Posts
Holtec advancing clean nuclear energy despite NJ politics
Watch “Getting to Clean Energy with Ted Glick” on YouTube
Indian Point Powering Down | Yonkers Times
Companies seek transfer of Southwest Michigan’s nuclear plant license after shutdown in 2022
Nuclear Power to Save the Climate? You Gotta be Kidding!” Watch this video!
Recent Comments
Marilyn Elie
on
Cortlandt establishes Citizens Advisory Board
Min Tompkins
on
Cortlandt establishes Citizens Advisory Board
Waesche Service
on
States Are Using Taxpayer Money to Greenwash Dirty Nuclear Power
Ken Gale
on
The 25% Myth
Joel E. Gingold
on
Terra Firma Article
Archives
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
June 2012
March 2012
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
August 2002
May 2002
March 2002
February 2002
October 2001
April 2001
April 1994
Categories
Action
Closure Agreement
Decommissioning
Editorials
Events
featured-decomissioning-articles
gordon-edwards-articles
History
News
Press Releases
Resources
Scientific Concepts
Uncategorized
Videos
Meta
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org
HOME
ABOUT
About IPSEC
About Indian Point
Annual Reports
Archives
Links
VIDEO ARCHIVE
RESOURCES
Indian Point Presentation
Indian Point Annual Report
TIMELINE
Indian Point Closure Timeline
Closure Agreement Provisions
TAKE ACTION
Postcards
CALENDAR
DONATE
CONTACT
News
“Inside New York’s Indian Point nuclear power plant” by Allan Chernoff
by
Site Admin
on
Mar 24, 2011
•
12:19 pm
No Comments
“
Stepping into the containment dome of Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant No. 3 is almost surreal. It’s like entering a movie set, but instead of walking by wooden props, we’re passing through an 11-foot-thick concrete-and-steel wall.
This is the nuclear facility that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo wants to shut down, the longtime target of both anti-nuclear and environmental activists, the nuclear power plant that sits only 25 miles from New York City.
Just a strip of yellow tape warning of radioactive danger separates me, my producer Sheila Steffen and cameramen Rod Griola and Ken Borland from white-uniformed technicians who are removing groups of nuclear fuel rods (204 rods are packaged together in each fuel assembly) and inserting new ones, a month-long process that takes place every two years.
Armed guards stand behind us, even after we have cleared three levels of tight security and a radiation briefing. Getting into the White House is easier, far easier.
Around my neck are two Indian Point security passes and two dosimeters that will measure the amount of radiation I receive: one will be sent for analysis to a laboratory, the other is an electronic-arming dosimeter, a real-time radiation detector set to beep if I were to receive a dose of 100 millirems per hour. (During our radiation briefing we are told a chest X-ray delivers 8 millirems.)
A massive 100-ton steel plug hangs from cables. Below, workers surround the nuclear core, which is underwater. They control machinery that delicately moves the fuel assemblies through a water-filled canal connected to the spent fuel pool, where rods filled with uranium pellets cool down for years. There are nearly 50,000 uranium pellets in each fuel assembly collection of rods.
Pumps keep water circulating into the pool so it remains at a temperature of 100 degrees Fahrenheit (compared to the 2,100 degrees that nuclear fuel can reach before it would meltdown). So, keeping the power on here is essential to averting disaster.
Indian Point receives its power from the same electric grid to which it contributes. If the power goes out — and it briefly did only three weeks ago due to a utility technician’s error — backup diesel generators kick in to keep the plant functioning. That’s exactly what happened during the recent outage. Each of Indian Point’s two reactors have three auxiliary diesel generators, and then there are separately located backups to those backups as well as diesel-driven fire pumps that can keep the spent fuel rod pools filled. It’s all designed to avoid the kind of catastrophe that occurred at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi plant.
Plant managers spend lots of time thinking about potential emergencies and how to avert them.
“Our plant is designed to handle the worst natural disaster. Our people are trained. We have many layers of redundancy,” said Joseph Dinelli, director of operations at Indian Point.
The plant is built to withstand at least a 6.0-magnitude earthquake, greater than the region has ever experienced, though researchers at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory warn a 7.0 is not out of the realm of possibility since they have determined the plant is built near the intersection of two active seismic zones.
“We believe that we can handle a (magnitude) 7 earthquake,” said Joseph Pollock, vice president of operations for Entergy, the plant’s owner. “The theoretically highest predicted earthquake in this area would be of a magnitude where our plant design will be able to withstand that and we would be able to respond and shut the plant down in a safe manner.”
In truth, Indian Point’s operators say, a severe hurricane is a far more likely event, for which they also have extensive contingency plans.
During the month-long refueling process at unit No. 3, the containment dome’s hatch remains open. To be prepared for a natural hazard — or even the possibility of an attack — Indian Point keeps a giant plug sitting on a massive forklift nearby that plant workers can shove into place within 15 minutes to protect the reactor.
Such precautions and procedures are part of Entergy’s application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a 20-year operating license renewal. Unit No. 3’s license expires in 2015, unit No. 2 in 2013. (Indian Point shut down its original reactor, No. 1, in 1974).
Back inside the dome, after technicians vertically lift a 12-foot fuel assembly from the nuclear core, they turn it horizontally and move it along a water-filled canal to the adjacent building that houses the spent fuel pool where the assembly is positioned in an upright rack for cooling, which takes years. The pool is about 40 feet deep, surrounded by 6 feet of concrete on all sides and it has a greenish tint to it. Workers stand on metal ramps overhead, prepared to accept the next spent fuel assembly. My electronic arming dosimeter registers a .3 millirem, its first detection of radiation. In a locked, plexiglass-enclosed case not far from the pool sit brand new fuel assemblies fresh from Westinghouse, waiting their turn for a swim to the nuclear reactor core.
As precise as the underwater operations are, they are not without flaw. In unit No. 2, Indian Point’s other active plant, there has been a relatively small leak during refueling that officials say has let out as much as eight gallons of contaminated water a day into the containment dome area.
“We haven’t found the exact location of the leak to be able to do the repair and stop it,” said Pollock. “We’re working with a couple of firms. Right now there’s a technique being used in Germany that we’re trying to see if it would work here and we’re going through that evaluation right now.”
Pollock says the leak is neither cause for concern nor a safety hazard since it’s within one of the reactor domes.
As we leave the spent fuel pool, we hand in both our dosimeters for analysis before stepping into a device that detects if we’ve picked up any contaminants on our clothing or shoes. I step in, push my chest against the oversized metal detector style contraption, wait an uncomfortably long 30 seconds, then do the same with my back up against the device.
My heartbeat slows as I step through the locked security gate and walk back towards the largest part of the nuclear plant: the power-generating room.
This is where the steam that’s created from the nuclear reactor flows through huge tubes to turn giant turbines that power the generator that produces the electricity Indian Point sends off to the grid. Each plant generates 1,000 megawatts of power, providing as much as 30% of the electricity for New York and Westchester County. Since unit No. 3 is undergoing refueling, workers are busy maintaining and upgrading the turbines and generator.
Both Indian Point plants are pressurized water reactors, as opposed to the crippled Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan, which is a boiling water reactor. Pressurized reactors aren’t necessarily safer than boiling water reactors, they just employ a different technique to harness the heat generated by nuclear fission to produce steam.
As the nuclear crisis unfolds in Japan, Indian Point officials say they’re hoping for details that might help operations here.
“Undoubtedly we will come back with lessons learned to continue to improve our safety margins and increase them even further,” said Pollack.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is initiating a safety review of Indian Point and all other U.S. nuclear power facilities, as part of its response to the crisis in Japan.
“
To view the complete article, search the archives at the link below:
http://www.cnn.com/
Previous post
"Fukushima, Indian Point and Fantasy" by Peter Applebome
Next post
"Indian Point 50-mile evacuation plan unrealistic"
What do you think?
Cancel reply
Name
required
Email
required
Website
Decommissioning Articles
Read now >
Legislative Toolkit
Get the toolkit >
Citizen Oversight Board Information
Read about our COB proposal >
Donate to IPSEC securely through A.J. Muste Memorial Institute
THE COMPLETE INDIAN POINT CLOSURE AGREEMENT
AIR AND WATER AD (click for documentation)
THE 25% MYTH
Buy No Nukes stickers and booklets
Archives
Archives
Select Month
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
June 2012
March 2012
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
August 2002
May 2002
March 2002
February 2002
October 2001
April 2001
April 1994