Local officials in Ulster, Dutchess, Orange, Westchester and NYC have come out with the same claim in response to the proposed closing of Indian Point with each official claiming that Indian Point produces 25% of the electricity for their area. They are all very concerned about replacement power. They have been duped and need not worry. The electricity from Indian Point has already been replaced.

But first, some simple math. Entergy makes 2,060 MW of electricity at Indian Point. According to Con Ed, our peak winter load for NYC and Westchester is 9,000 MW and jumps to 13,000 MW in the summer. Entergy can’t produce a quarter of either of those figures, even if it all of their electricity went into our grid – which it doesn’t. Entergy sells 560 MW to Con Ed and bids 1,500 MW into the summer Mid-Hudson Capacity market that serves five counties. In the winter the NYT and Bloomberg News report that it sends 1,500 MW to the Boston area where a lot of gas is diverted for heating and the price of electricity is high. (http://tinyurl.com/bostonprices) The New York Power Authority which supplies the subways, Metro North, municipalities and government buildings among other things has not purchased electricity from Indian Point for years because they can get it cheaper elsewhere. (http://bit.ly/ZvIi41)

What’s left – nothing except the false 25% story that Entergy has told for so long that most people take it as gospel. Like a typical flim-flam artist Entergy claims it is selling the same 25% share of the electricity simultaneously to the five Mid Hudson counties, NYC and Westchester.

Replacement power does not have to be new generation. It can come from improvements in the transmission lines, increased efficiency where you get more work out of the same amount of electricity, or from something as simple as “demand response” where large users are paid to curtail usage at peak times and make extra MW’s available to the grid. There is a mixture of all of that plus new generation in the list below.

This is a list of the replacement power that came on line in 2016, with more to come in 2017 along with a bit of history about how it all happened.

Replacement Power for Indian Point 

In 2012 Governor Cuomo directed the Public Service Commission to develop a plan for the closing of Indian Point.  A Requests For Proposals was put out to the private sector. In addition, several energy market evaluations including the Indian Point Energy Center Retirement Analysis (http://tinyurl.com/nycenergy) which was prepared for the City of New York, the  Synapse Report, (http://tinyurl.com/rksynapse) and the 2013 Energy Highway Blueprint prepared by the State of New York (http://tinyurl.com/NYShighway) made recommendations about replacement electricity for Indian Point. All concluded that sufficient planning for renewables coupled with privately financed supply projects, would allow a smooth transition away from Indian Point.

Between 2012 and 2015, market circumstances rapidly changed. The first surprise in 2013 was that both Danskammer and Bowline, which were both out of service and expected to be demolished, were being refurbished and brought back on line as gas generators. This happened largely because a special capacity zone was established by the Independent System Operator to encourage additional generation in this part of the grid. As a consequence, 1,650 MW of unanticipated electricity became available in addition to the transmission accommodations, which were already in place. As a result, the PSC determined that the construction of new power plants was not necessary in order to replace Indian Point.  Most significantly, in the fall of 2013 the PSC terminated its Request For Proposals and closed the door on new generation in this region. It should be noted that demand for electricity has not increased at the anticipated rate due to efficiency, conservation, and demand response which allows large users of electricity to be paid to reduce use during peak times. With the emphasis New York State has placed on roof top solar, solar generation will undoubted play a role in smoothing out peak demand as well.

Since the 2012 projections and the Energy Highway Blueprint recommendations, over 5,000 megawatts of electricity have been added to the system through transmissions upgrades, efficiency, and demand reduction from distributed generation. This provides over twice the electricity needed to replace the 2,000 megawatts generated at Indian Point. Some of this is gas generation, as the list below indicates. The carbon footprint for these plants has been anticipated and is already figured into the NYS Clean Energy Plan.

  • Danskammer (Newburgh) power plant                          550 MW

  • Bowline (Haverstraw) power plant                          1,100 MW

  • Hudson Transmission Project (NJ to NYC) cable                         660 MW

  • PSE&G (NJ to Ramapo) power line                                            380 MW

  • Con Ed (Bergen County interconnection) power line                     315 MW

  • TOTS (Westchester & Rockland Counties) power lines                 600 MW

  • NYSERDA  (Efficiency Projects)                                                    200 MW

  • AC Hudson Valley Transmission Upgrades                              1,000+ MW

  • New York Power Authority St. Lawrence Seaway                         440 MW 

       TOTAL                                                                                         5,245 MW  

More projects will be coming on line in 2017 and demand has not been as high as anticipated.  We have a surplus of electricity to replace Indian Point, with more megawatts to come.  So, a word to the wise – check your “facts” when they come from a source that stands to profit by them.  Do the math and breathe easy. We have a surplus of electricity. Indian Point has already been replaced.